Timing of Plan Contributions

Retirement plans are funded by contributions from employers and/or employees, depending upon the type of plan and the provisions established under the plan document. These contributions must be deposited to the trust established under the plan by certain dates.

Prior to the last decade, contribution timing issues centered around the minimum funding rules (which only apply to pension plans) and tax deduction rules. However, in recent years the 401(k) plan has become the most popular retirement vehicle in existence. With it has come a greater emphasis on the timing of a variety of contribution options that are available under such plans. Unfortunately, not all of the deposit deadlines for these plans are as clear-cut as one might expect.

401(k) Plans

The key component of a 401(k) plan is that it allows employees to defer a portion of their compensation into the plan, up to certain allowable limits. An individual account is typically established for each participant, who is often permitted to direct the investment of his or her account.

Other contributions may be made by the employer, such as matching contributions, safe harbor contributions and qualified non-elective contributions, some of which are based on employees’ deferrals.

Salary Deferrals

Since deferrals are deducted from employees’ wages on a regular basis (usually each paycheck), the issue has always been how quickly the deferrals must be transmitted to the plan. It is an issue which has generated much debate.

The Department of Labor (DOL) issued final regulation sec. 2510.3-102 years ago to address this subject, but it may have resulted in more confusion than clarification. Under the regulation, amounts that are paid by a participant or withheld from wages by an employer become plan assets as of the earliest date on which such contributions can reasonably be segregated from the employer’s general assets. The regulation does not, however, specify what a reasonable time period might be in which to implement this segregation. In an electronic society where most financial transactions are done by computer, this “segregation” concept seems antiquated. Nevertheless, since many employers remit taxes within days of withholding, it’s hard to argue against that same capability for withheld deferrals.

The regulation also states that in no event shall the segregation date be later than the 15th business day of the month following the month the contribution was received or withheld. Some employers who apparently relied upon this date as a safe harbor deadline eventually paid the price. The Internet is abuzz with tales of DOL audits in which employers, who believed they were acting within the regulation, were penalized for failure to remit salary deferrals on a timely basis. As a result, employers should consider remitting participant contributions as soon as possible and, in no event, less frequently than they make their tax deposits.

If participant contributions are not immediately deposited into the plan once they are considered to be plan assets, then the employer is engaging in a prohibited transaction. That’s because the employer has use of the money that belongs to the plan, which is a violation of ERISA. Prohibited transaction penalties could apply, as well as possible replacement of lost earnings and other penalties for breach of fiduciary duties.

This issue was litigated in federal court for the first time earlier this year. To the surprise of many, the judge sided with a failing “dot com” company in refusing to find that deferrals deposited as late as the 15th day of the following month were beyond DOL requirements. The DOL would likely disagree with the outcome of this case, and employers who rely on it do so at their own peril.

Loan Repayments

Loans to plan participants, secured by their vested benefits, are more common in 401(k) plans than any other plan. Repayments are often deducted from the employee’s wages, similar to salary deferrals. In a recent advisory opinion (2002-01A, May 17, 2002), the DOL compared loan repayments to participant contributions and stated that they too become plan assets as of the earliest date they can reasonably be segregated from the employer’s general assets. Although the DOL had previously said that loan repayments were not within the scope of the final regulations, this advisory opinion makes it clear they will receive similar treatment.

Matching Contributions

To entice employees to participate in their 401(k) plans, employers will often make a contribution to participants who defer a portion of their compensation into the plan. Such contributions are called matching contributions and are usually based on the amount of each participant’s deferrals. Some employers deposit these contributions on a regular basis throughout the year, while others deposit the entire amount after the plan year-end.

In order to be allocated in the current year and included in the non-discrimination test (see next section), matching contributions must be deposited by the last day of the following plan year. But in order to be deducted on the employer’s tax return for the year for which they are allocated, the matching contributions must be contributed by the due date of the employer’s tax return, including extensions. (This assumes the employer’s fiscal year is the same as the plan year. Where it is not, other rules apply.)

Example: ABC Company’s fiscal and 401(k) plan year are both the calendar year. The company always deposits the entire matching contribution after the plan year-end. For 2001, ABC has filed for an extension (to September 16, 2002) to file its federal tax return. The matching contribution is made September 4, 2002. Since it was contributed before the federal tax return due date (including the extension) it is deductible on the 2001 return. (This example assumes that the contributions are within the 2001 15% deduction limit.)

QNECs and QMACs

Each year a separate non-discrimination test must be performed for salary deferrals (ADP test) and matching and/or voluntary contributions (ACP test) under a 401(k) plan. One method of passing an otherwise failed test is for the employer to make a qualified non-elective contribution (QNEC) or a qualified matching contribution (QMAC) to some or all of the non-highly compensated employees. In order to be utilized in the test for a particular plan year, these contributions must be made by the last day of the following plan year. The timing issues that apply to the deduction of matching contributions also apply to QNEC and QMAC contributions.

Safe Harbor 401(k) Contributions

A 401(k) plan will be treated as automatically passing the ADP test for any year that it satisfies the safe harbor contribution requirement and the notice requirement. The contribution requirement can be met by either a specified matching contribution rate or an employer non-elective contribution of 3% of eligible employees’ compensation.

Generally, the safe harbor contribution must be made by the last day of the following plan year. The timing issues that apply to the deduction of matching contributions also apply to safe harbor contributions.

Where the safe harbor matching contribution is being made on a per payroll basis instead of an annual compensation basis, the match must be deposited by the last day of the following plan year quarter.

Profit Sharing Plans

Employer non-elective contributions to a profit sharing plan are generally credited in the year they are deposited. However, contributions made after the end of the employer’s fiscal year but before the due date for filing its federal tax return (including extensions) may be considered to have been paid as of the last day of the fiscal year. If the employer’s fiscal year is different than the plan year, other factors may have to be considered.

Example: The XYZ Corporation’s fiscal year is the calendar year. XYZ’s profit sharing plan also has a calendar plan year. For 2001, the due date of XYZ’s federal tax return was extended to September 16, 2002. Any employer contributions deposited by that date can be considered deposited on December 31, 2001 and allocated under the plan as of that date. They would be deductible to the corporation for 2001.

Money Purchase Pension Plans

Unlike profit sharing plans, in which employer contributions are often discretionary, money purchase pension plans require a specific contribution formula. Failure to deposit the required contribution is a violation of the minimum funding standards. The contribution deadline for minimum funding purposes is 8½ months after the end of the plan year. If the deadline is not met the employer is subject to a late funding penalty.

Where the employer’s fiscal year is the same as the plan year, this date matches the day a corporation could extend the due date of its tax return. This allows the employer to deduct the payments necessary to fully fund the plan within the allowable funding period. However, the 8½ month funding period exists regardless of whether or not the corporation files for an extension.

Non-corporate entities such as partnerships and sole proprietors have different tax filing due dates which must be taken into consideration for deduction purposes.

Top Heavy Contributions

If a plan is considered to be top heavy (i.e., at least 60% of the benefits belong to key employees), it must provide minimum contributions, usually 3% of compensation, to non-key employees. Such top heavy contributions must be paid by the last day of the following plan year. The timing issues that apply to the deduction of matching contributions also apply to top heavy contributions.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans are based on actuarial calculations which spread out payments over the years to provide for specific benefits as they become due. As with money purchase plans, defined benefit plans are also subject to the minimum funding rules, which allow required contributions to be made up to 8½ months after the end of the plan year.

Plans that do not contribute enough money to fully fund the current benefit liabilities must make deposits on a quarterly basis or else notify employees that quarterly deposits will not be made. The timing issues that apply to the deduction of money purchase plan contributions also apply to defined benefit plan contributions.

Conclusion

It is important for plan sponsors to know the required due dates for contributions to their qualified retirement plans. This will enable them to take full advantage of contribution opportunities and prevent late penalties for failure to timely contribute. With the increased popularity of the 401(k) plan, the timing of salary deferral contributions has become an important issue.

While DOL regulations are not crystal clear as to the deadline for the transmittal of these contributions, it is clear that the 15th business day of the following month rule is not a safe harbor deadline upon which employers can rely. Prudence dictates the deposit of these funds as soon as practical, to avoid any possible prohibited transaction penalties or other adverse ramifications.

With so many different types of contributions available in retirement plans today, it is important to double-check the due dates to avoid confusion.

 

This newsletter is intended to provide general information on matters of interest in the area of qualified retirement plans and is distributed with the understanding that the publisher and distributor are not rendering legal, tax or other professional advice. Readers should not act or rely on any information in this newsletter without first seeking the advice of an independent tax advisor such as an attorney or CPA.

We’re leaders in retirement plan administration.
How can we help you get where you want to go?

Serving Clients for 40 Years

Spring will arrive soon, promising new growth and a fresh beginning. It could also be the perfect time to do some spring cleaning for your plan. Let’s look at some areas that you might consider reviewing to ensure your retirement plan is operating efficiently.

Document your processes and procedures to make certain that plan tasks can be handled in case of any absences during an enrollment or pay period. Having a backup in place can prevent errors and delays that could lead to penalties.

Make sure to have a process in place to notify all new enrollments of their eligibility, regardless of whether the plan has automatic enrollment. Depending on the timing for plan entry, including the plan enrollment paperwork with the new hire paperwork could make entry easier for you. Please reach out with any questions regarding when an employee enters the plan.

Deposits of employee deferrals and loan repayments must be submitted to the plan as soon as possible to avoid penalties and corrections. For plans with less than 100 participants, a safe harbor rule allows deposits to be made within seven business days. For larger plans, the expectation is that the money will be deposited more quickly. Depositing these funds on the pay date will avoid the possibility of being late.

Monitoring deferral contribution limits during the calendar year will avoid refunds after year end. Make sure that your payroll is set up to stop deferrals once the limit is reached, including any catch-up contributions for those who have reached age 50.

To keep the plan in compliance, employer contributions must be deposited timely. Due dates are impacted by the type of contributions, required status and tax deductibility. If you have questions on when to deposit your employer contribution or even whether to make an employer contribution, please contact us.

Most plans must be covered by a fidelity bond. The minimum coverage is 10% of plan assets (rounded up to the next $1,000) and the maximum coverage is $500,000. Additional requirements apply to plans with employer securities or non-publicly traded assets. If your fidelity bond is insufficient, now is the time to raise the coverage. Inflation clauses that increase the bond amount as the plan assets increase can ensure that your bond coverage is always adequate. Contact us or your insurance provider if you don’t have a fidelity bond.

Another area to review is communication with participants. Helping your employees understand and trust the plan can increase their contributions. Be sure that your procedures include distributing any plan-related communications—including required participant notices.

Distributions also involve communication, including some of the aforementioned notices. Discussing distribution options with terminated participants, possibly as part of an exit interview, can help to reduce risk of lost participants. We’ll provide instruction on distributions for force-out distributions for small balances, testing corrections and required minimum distributions.

Your plan document is the legal source on how the plan should be administered; operating within its parameters is critical. It’s always worth taking time to review the plan document to ensure that you fully understand and are following its provisions. We’ll cover more details about the plan document later in this newsletter. We’re here to support you in keeping your plan in compliance. Please feel free to reach out with any questions.

Addressing the Challenge of Uncashed Distribution Checks

Uncashed distribution checks present a persistent and often overlooked challenge for retirement plan sponsors. Despite the best efforts of plan administrators, some participants fail to cash their distribution checks, leading to administrative burdens, fiduciary concerns and potential compliance issues. A recent publication by Retirement Management Services (RMS) sheds light on this issue and offers practical guidance for employers seeking to manage and mitigate the risks associated with uncashed checks.

Uncashed checks can arise for various reasons. Participants may have moved without updating their contact information, may not recognize the check as legitimate or may simply forget to deposit it. Regardless of the cause, the responsibility for addressing these uncashed funds ultimately falls on the plan sponsor. This creates a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of the participant while ensuring compliance with IRS and Department of Labor (DOL) regulations.

Sponsors are encouraged to maintain up-to-date contact information for all plan participants and to follow up promptly when checks remain uncashed. This may involve sending reminder letters, making phone calls or using certified mail to confirm receipt. In some cases, plan sponsors may also consider using electronic payment methods to reduce the likelihood of checks going uncashed in the first place.

The IRS and DOL have issued guidance on how to handle these situations, including the use of forfeiture accounts and escheatment to state unclaimed property programs. However, these options come with their own set of rules and potential pitfalls. For example, using a forfeiture account may require the plan document to explicitly allow for such treatment. Escheatment laws, which allow the government to assume control of unclaimed property, vary by state. As such, plan sponsors must carefully evaluate their options and consult with legal or compliance experts as needed.

Another important consideration is the documentation of all the efforts made to contact participants and resolve uncashed checks. Maintaining a clear audit trail can help demonstrate fiduciary prudence and protect the plan sponsor in the event of an audit or legal challenge. It is extremely important to have a written policy in place that outlines the steps to be taken when a check remains uncashed beyond a certain period.

By taking a proactive, well-documented and compliant approach, employers can fulfill their fiduciary duties, reduce administrative burdens and ensure that participants receive the benefits they are entitled to.

Source: Retirement Management Services – “Uncashed Distribution Checks” https://www.consultrms.com/Resources/59/Plan-Sponsor-Tips-and-Help/212/Uncashed-Distribution-Checks

Divorce and the Retirement Plan

When a participant in a qualified retirement plan undergoes a divorce, the participant’s account balance may be an asset that is split with the former spouse. As the plan exists for the exclusive benefit of its participants, a court order is required to transfer the participant’s benefits to the ex-spouse. Once approved by the plan administrator, this court order is called a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).

The QDRO is a judgment, decree or order that must be issued by a state authority (usually a court). It can be part of the divorce settlement or it may be a separate document. Because of the serious nature of separating the participant’s account balance, the QDRO is more than just an agreement made by both parties — it must also be signed by a judge.

A QDRO will describe how to divide the participant’s account balance between the participant and the ex-spouse, referred to as the alternate payee. In some cases, a set dollar amount will be allocated; in others, a percentage of the account may be designated. In the latter case, the amount assigned to the alternate payee represents the given percentage of the participant’s total vested account balance as of a specified valuation date. This percentage will apply to all sources — such as deferrals, matching or profit sharing — unless specified by the QDRO. Any interest and investment gains/losses that accrue between this valuation date and the date the funds are separated into an account for the alternate payee are often factored into this final calculation. If the participant has outstanding loans, the QDRO will usually indicate how the loans are handled.

Contributions such as deferrals and employer matching made after the valuation date are credited to the participant’s account. Earnings and losses are applied to the account balances. Once the division is complete, the alternate payee’s portion (either dollars or shares) is transferred to an account in the alternate payee’s name.

If the plan allows, the alternate payee may be paid out in a cash or rollover distribution. Not all plan documents allow the alternate payee to receive a distribution before reaching normal retirement age, so it’s important to follow the terms of the plan. In addition, the QDRO cannot violate the provisions of the plan document by requiring a plan to provide an alternate payee or participant with any type or form of benefit not otherwise provided under the plan.

Although the most common situation for a QDRO is a divorce, it can be issued in other situations, such as to a dependent in the case of child support. If the alternate payee is a minor child or legally incompetent, the order can also require payment to the individual with legal responsibility for the alternate payee. If a participant or their attorney provides you with a copy of a divorce decree that references the plan or a QDRO, please contact us immediately, and we will work with you to ensure it meets the requirements of the plan.

Important note for defined benefit plans: For 2025 plan years, PBGC premiums are due one month earlier than usual, specifically on the 15th day of the ninth month after the beginning of the plan year. For calendar year plans, this means the premium is due on September 15, 2025, instead of the usual October 15. This accelerated deadline is due to a provision in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.

Upcoming Compliance Deadlines for Calendar-Year Plans

 

Top of Page

© 2025 Benefit Insights, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

© 2026 Red Bank Pension Services. All rights reserved. Website by GSM Marketing