The 401(k) plan has emerged as the most popular form of retirement plan in the United States. This trend will likely continue for some time for a number of reasons. One is the cost savings to employers, since deferral contributions are paid by employees. Another is the fact that 401(k) plans are more easily understood than traditional retirement plans and consequently more appreciated by employees.
One aspect of 401(k) plans that is not so easily understood is the annual contribution nondiscrimination testing. This article will review the mechanics of this required testing and correction methods for failed tests.
Highly Compensated Employees
Every 401(k) plan, other than “SIMPLE” plans, “Safe Harbor” plans or “Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements,” requires an annual test to prevent discrimination in favor of the group of employees referred to as “highly compensated employees” (HCEs). Employees who fall into the following two categories are considered to be HCEs:
- An owner of more than 5% of the employer in the testing year or the previous year (family stock attribution rules apply which treat an individual as owning stock owned by his spouse, children, grandchildren or parents), or
- An employee who received compensation in excess of a specified limit from the employer in the previous year (e.g., employees who earned more than $100,000 in 2007 will be considered HCEs in 2008). The employer may elect that this group be limited to the top 20% of employees based on compensation.
401(k) Nondiscrimination Testing
The nondiscrimination rules require average deferrals and average contributions for the HCE group to be within a certain range of the average deferrals and contributions for the “non-highly compensated employee” (NHCE) group.
Testing of employee deferrals is referred to as the ADP test (Average Deferral Percentage). The ACP test (Average Contribution Percentage) includes the employer match contributions, employee voluntary after-tax contributions and certain forfeitures allocated on the basis of deferrals or matching contributions.
Each participant’s deferral or contribution percentage is determined by dividing the applicable deferral or contributions by the compensation defined in the plan document. Averages are then determined for the HCE and NHCE groups by dividing the sum of the deferral or contribution percentages by the number of employees in the group. Below is an example of the ADP determination:
| Employee | Compensation | Deferral | ADP |
| HCE 1 | $200,000 | $12,000 | 6.00% |
| HCE 2 | 110,000 | 5,500 | 5.00% |
| HCE Total: | 11.00% | ||
| HCE Average (11.00% ÷ 2): | 5.50% | ||
| NHCE 1 | 50,000 | 4,000 | 8.00% |
| NHCE 2 | 40,000 | 2,000 | 5.00% |
| NHCE 3 | 30,000 | 0 | 0.00% |
| NHCE 4 | 20,000 | 800 | 4.00% |
| NHCE Total: | 17.00% | ||
| NHCE Average (17.00% ÷ 4): | 4.25% | ||
The HCEs’ average may only exceed the NHCEs’ average (for both the ADP and ACP tests) by specific limits summarized as follows:
| NHCE Percentage | Maximum HCE Percentage | |
| 2% or less | NHCE % x 2 | |
| 2% – 8% | NHCE % + 2 | |
| more than 8% | NHCE % x 1.25 |
In the above example, the maximum ADP of the HCE group is 6.25% (the NHCE average of 4.25% plus 2%). The test passes since the ADP of the HCE group is 5.50% which is less than the 6.25% maximum.
Catch-up contributions (available to participants who are age 50 or older if permitted by the plan) that exceed a statutory limit or plan-imposed limit are not included in performing the ADP test. Also, compensation for plan purposes is subject to an annual limit ($225,000 for 2007 and $230,000 for 2008). For example, assume Harry earned $300,000 in 2007 and deferred $20,500 (the maximum deferral of $15,500 for 2007 plus the maximum catch-up contribution of $5,000). His deferral percentage is calculated by dividing $15,500 (his deferral without the catch-up contribution) by $225,000 (the compensation limit for 2007).
Employees Included in Testing
In performing the ADP test, all active and terminated employees eligible to defer at any time during the plan year are included, whether or not they actually made a deferral.
The following employees are included in the ACP test, regardless of whether they received matching contributions or made after-tax contributions:
- Active employees who have met the plan’s requirements to receive a match as of the plan year-end being tested (e.g., if the plan requires active employees to have more than 500 hours of service during the plan year in order to receive matching contributions, employees with less than 501 hours are not included);
- Employees who terminated during the plan year being tested if they met the plan’s requirements to receive a match (e.g., if the plan requires 1,000 hours of service and/or employment on the last day of the plan year, employees who have not met these requirements are not included); and
- All employees eligible to make voluntary after-tax contributions at any time during the plan year.
Plans that allow employees to participate before they reach age 21 or complete one year of service are permitted to exclude such employees from the test if they are NHCEs.
If the plan covers both union and non-union employees, each group must be tested separately.
Related Companies
Employees who work for a “related” company may also have to be considered. Related companies are either part of a “controlled group of corporations” or an “affiliated service group.” Whenever an individual who owns any portion of the sponsoring employer buys into another business, the plan’s advisors should be notified so a controlled group determination can be made. The same applies if another company works together with the employer to provide services to each other or to third parties which could constitute an affiliated service group. These circumstances create important issues that could affect the qualification of the plan.
Testing Methods
Two testing methods are permitted. The first method is current year testing where current year deferral and contribution percentages are used to compare the percentages of both HCEs and NHCEs.
The other method is prior year testing where the deferral and contribution percentages for NHCEs in the prior year are compared with HCE deferral and contribution percentages in the current year. The prior year testing method gives employers the ADP and ACP limits for the HCEs in advance, which reduces the chance of a failed test at year-end and the need for taxable refunds or other corrective measures.
Whichever testing method is chosen, regulations require it to be specified in the plan document. The testing method may only be changed by amendment, subject to certain restrictions on changing from current year to prior year testing.
Mechanics of Prior Year Testing
In the first year of a 401(k) plan, or the first year 401(k) provisions are effective in an existing plan, a special rule applies since there are no prior year percentages to use for the test. The employer can assume a prior year percentage for the NHCEs of 3% for both the ADP and ACP tests or use the actual results of the first year’s test.
The second year, the maximum HCE percentage will be based on the NHCE percentage from the first year. At the end of the second year the test will be performed which will be used for two purposes:
- The average HCE percentage will be compared to the maximum permitted average percentage (based on the NHCE percentage from the first year) to verify that the maximum was not exceeded, and
- The NHCE average percentage will be used to determine the maximum average HCE percentage for the third year.
Correcting Test Failures
Plans that do not pass the ADP and/or ACP tests must take some action, such as making corrective distributions or additional employer contributions.
Refund Deferrals/Matching Contributions
The most common method used to correct a failed ADP or ACP test is to make corrective distributions of the excess deferrals or contributions, plus earnings (in some cases, forfeiture of matching contributions may be required).
Corrective distribution amounts (determined by a required leveling method) are allocated among the HCEs based on the dollar amount of their deferrals or contributions. If the plan permits catch-up contributions and the participant is 50 or older and has unused catch-up contributions remaining, the ADP refund is first offset by the unused catch-up contributions.
These distributions must be made within 2½ months of the plan year-end in order to avoid a 10% penalty (this deadline is extended to six months for plans that meet the eligible automatic contribution arrangement requirements). The final deadline for making corrective distributions with the penalty is the last day of the following plan year. For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, these distributions are taxable in the year in which they are distributed (for plan years prior to 2008, distributions made before the 2½-month period are taxable in the prior year).
QNECs and QMACs
In some situations, a failed nondiscrimination test can be corrected by having the employer make a “qualified nonelective contribution” (QNEC) or “qualified matching contribution” (QMAC). These additional employer contributions are made to NHCEs to increase their ADP or ACP to the level needed for the HCEs to pass the test. QNECs and QMACs are required to be immediately 100% vested and subject to withdrawal restrictions. These contributions must be deposited by the last day of the following plan year.
Conclusion
Nondiscrimination testing sounds complex–and it is. Gaining a better understanding of this testing should help plan sponsors appreciate the importance of providing complete and accurate census data to their advisors.
Census information, including all employees, should be compiled as soon as possible after the plan year ends so that nondiscrimination testing can be performed accurately and any corrective distributions can be made in a timely manner in order to avoid the 10% penalty.
It is also important for business owners to be aware that related companies may impact nondiscrimination testing and to disclose to their advisors any and all ownership interests or service affiliations. This will help ensure that the plan maintains its qualified status.
This newsletter is intended to provide general information on matters of interest in the area of qualified retirement plans and is distributed with the understanding that the publisher and distributor are not rendering legal, tax or other professional advice. Readers should not act or rely on any information in this newsletter without first seeking the advice of an independent tax advisor such as an attorney or CPA.
We’re leaders in retirement plan administration.
How can we help you get where you want to go?
Phone: (732) 747-1540
Email: [email protected]
Spring will arrive soon, promising new growth and a fresh beginning. It could also be the perfect time to do some spring cleaning for your plan. Let’s look at some areas that you might consider reviewing to ensure your retirement plan is operating efficiently.
Document your processes and procedures to make certain that plan tasks can be handled in case of any absences during an enrollment or pay period. Having a backup in place can prevent errors and delays that could lead to penalties.
Make sure to have a process in place to notify all new enrollments of their eligibility, regardless of whether the plan has automatic enrollment. Depending on the timing for plan entry, including the plan enrollment paperwork with the new hire paperwork could make entry easier for you. Please reach out with any questions regarding when an employee enters the plan.
Deposits of employee deferrals and loan repayments must be submitted to the plan as soon as possible to avoid penalties and corrections. For plans with less than 100 participants, a safe harbor rule allows deposits to be made within seven business days. For larger plans, the expectation is that the money will be deposited more quickly. Depositing these funds on the pay date will avoid the possibility of being late.
Monitoring deferral contribution limits during the calendar year will avoid refunds after year end. Make sure that your payroll is set up to stop deferrals once the limit is reached, including any catch-up contributions for those who have reached age 50.
To keep the plan in compliance, employer contributions must be deposited timely. Due dates are impacted by the type of contributions, required status and tax deductibility. If you have questions on when to deposit your employer contribution or even whether to make an employer contribution, please contact us.
Most plans must be covered by a fidelity bond. The minimum coverage is 10% of plan assets (rounded up to the next $1,000) and the maximum coverage is $500,000. Additional requirements apply to plans with employer securities or non-publicly traded assets. If your fidelity bond is insufficient, now is the time to raise the coverage. Inflation clauses that increase the bond amount as the plan assets increase can ensure that your bond coverage is always adequate. Contact us or your insurance provider if you don’t have a fidelity bond.
Another area to review is communication with participants. Helping your employees understand and trust the plan can increase their contributions. Be sure that your procedures include distributing any plan-related communications—including required participant notices.
Distributions also involve communication, including some of the aforementioned notices. Discussing distribution options with terminated participants, possibly as part of an exit interview, can help to reduce risk of lost participants. We’ll provide instruction on distributions for force-out distributions for small balances, testing corrections and required minimum distributions.
Your plan document is the legal source on how the plan should be administered; operating within its parameters is critical. It’s always worth taking time to review the plan document to ensure that you fully understand and are following its provisions. We’ll cover more details about the plan document later in this newsletter. We’re here to support you in keeping your plan in compliance. Please feel free to reach out with any questions.
Addressing the Challenge of Uncashed Distribution Checks
Uncashed distribution checks present a persistent and often overlooked challenge for retirement plan sponsors. Despite the best efforts of plan administrators, some participants fail to cash their distribution checks, leading to administrative burdens, fiduciary concerns and potential compliance issues. A recent publication by Retirement Management Services (RMS) sheds light on this issue and offers practical guidance for employers seeking to manage and mitigate the risks associated with uncashed checks.
Uncashed checks can arise for various reasons. Participants may have moved without updating their contact information, may not recognize the check as legitimate or may simply forget to deposit it. Regardless of the cause, the responsibility for addressing these uncashed funds ultimately falls on the plan sponsor. This creates a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of the participant while ensuring compliance with IRS and Department of Labor (DOL) regulations.
Sponsors are encouraged to maintain up-to-date contact information for all plan participants and to follow up promptly when checks remain uncashed. This may involve sending reminder letters, making phone calls or using certified mail to confirm receipt. In some cases, plan sponsors may also consider using electronic payment methods to reduce the likelihood of checks going uncashed in the first place.
The IRS and DOL have issued guidance on how to handle these situations, including the use of forfeiture accounts and escheatment to state unclaimed property programs. However, these options come with their own set of rules and potential pitfalls. For example, using a forfeiture account may require the plan document to explicitly allow for such treatment. Escheatment laws, which allow the government to assume control of unclaimed property, vary by state. As such, plan sponsors must carefully evaluate their options and consult with legal or compliance experts as needed.
Another important consideration is the documentation of all the efforts made to contact participants and resolve uncashed checks. Maintaining a clear audit trail can help demonstrate fiduciary prudence and protect the plan sponsor in the event of an audit or legal challenge. It is extremely important to have a written policy in place that outlines the steps to be taken when a check remains uncashed beyond a certain period.
By taking a proactive, well-documented and compliant approach, employers can fulfill their fiduciary duties, reduce administrative burdens and ensure that participants receive the benefits they are entitled to.
Source: Retirement Management Services – “Uncashed Distribution Checks” https://www.consultrms.com/Resources/59/Plan-Sponsor-Tips-and-Help/212/Uncashed-Distribution-Checks
Divorce and the Retirement Plan
When a participant in a qualified retirement plan undergoes a divorce, the participant’s account balance may be an asset that is split with the former spouse. As the plan exists for the exclusive benefit of its participants, a court order is required to transfer the participant’s benefits to the ex-spouse. Once approved by the plan administrator, this court order is called a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).
The QDRO is a judgment, decree or order that must be issued by a state authority (usually a court). It can be part of the divorce settlement or it may be a separate document. Because of the serious nature of separating the participant’s account balance, the QDRO is more than just an agreement made by both parties — it must also be signed by a judge.
A QDRO will describe how to divide the participant’s account balance between the participant and the ex-spouse, referred to as the alternate payee. In some cases, a set dollar amount will be allocated; in others, a percentage of the account may be designated. In the latter case, the amount assigned to the alternate payee represents the given percentage of the participant’s total vested account balance as of a specified valuation date. This percentage will apply to all sources — such as deferrals, matching or profit sharing — unless specified by the QDRO. Any interest and investment gains/losses that accrue between this valuation date and the date the funds are separated into an account for the alternate payee are often factored into this final calculation. If the participant has outstanding loans, the QDRO will usually indicate how the loans are handled.
Contributions such as deferrals and employer matching made after the valuation date are credited to the participant’s account. Earnings and losses are applied to the account balances. Once the division is complete, the alternate payee’s portion (either dollars or shares) is transferred to an account in the alternate payee’s name.
If the plan allows, the alternate payee may be paid out in a cash or rollover distribution. Not all plan documents allow the alternate payee to receive a distribution before reaching normal retirement age, so it’s important to follow the terms of the plan. In addition, the QDRO cannot violate the provisions of the plan document by requiring a plan to provide an alternate payee or participant with any type or form of benefit not otherwise provided under the plan.
Although the most common situation for a QDRO is a divorce, it can be issued in other situations, such as to a dependent in the case of child support. If the alternate payee is a minor child or legally incompetent, the order can also require payment to the individual with legal responsibility for the alternate payee. If a participant or their attorney provides you with a copy of a divorce decree that references the plan or a QDRO, please contact us immediately, and we will work with you to ensure it meets the requirements of the plan.
Important note for defined benefit plans: For 2025 plan years, PBGC premiums are due one month earlier than usual, specifically on the 15th day of the ninth month after the beginning of the plan year. For calendar year plans, this means the premium is due on September 15, 2025, instead of the usual October 15. This accelerated deadline is due to a provision in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.
Upcoming Compliance Deadlines for Calendar-Year Plans
© 2025 Benefit Insights, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
© 2026 Red Bank Pension Services. All rights reserved. Website by GSM Marketing