Despite the care taken by plan sponsors and their pension advisors, errors occur in qualified plan administration. It is to no one’s advantage to have such errors disqualify a plan or to create penalties so onerous that plan sponsors are discouraged from having plans altogether.
Fortunately, programs are available under the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the Department of Labor (“DOL”) to correct errors and abate penalties. In general, both agencies reward plan sponsors who discover the errors and report them voluntarily as opposed to errors that are found upon audit or inquiry.
Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”)
The EPCRS is a group of voluntary compliance programs used in correcting defects in a qualified plan that would otherwise disqualify the plan. EPCRS can be used to correct many qualification failures, which generally fall into three categories:
Plan Document Failures: Failure of the document to conform with the Internal Revenue Code and IRS regulations. Plan sponsors who fail to timely adopt required plan amendments fall within this group.
Operational Failures: Includes failures to follow the terms of the plan document, such as failure to cover eligible employees, failing to satisfy the top heavy requirements and failing the ADP and ACP tests for 401(k) plans.
Demographic Failures: Failure to meet minimum participation, minimum coverage or nondiscrimination requirements.
EPCRS cannot be used to correct the diversion or misuse of plan assets. It also cannot be used for Section 457 plans, non-qualified plans, welfare benefit plans, IRAs or cafeteria plans.
EPCRS includes two voluntary correction mechanisms, the Self Correction Program and the Voluntary Correction Program, as well as the Audit Closing Agreement Program. An overview of each program follows.
Self Correction Program (“SCP”)
SCP allows qualified plan sponsors to correct operational failures or defects without filing with the IRS or paying any penalty tax. The program allows the correction of both insignificant defects as well as, in limited circumstances, significant defects. Demographic and plan document failures cannot utilize SCP.
Insignificant Corrections
Generally, in order for a correction to be considered insignificant, it must be an isolated incident, and the plan must otherwise have a history of compliance in all other areas. Factors that need to be analyzed include:
- The number of errors that occurred;
- The percentage of plan assets and contributions involved in the error;
- The number of years the error occurred;
- The number of plan participants affected;
- The time it took the plan sponsor to correct the error; and
- The reason the error occurred.
Insignificant defects can be corrected at any time. The program can be utilized even if the plan is under examination by the IRS.
Significant Corrections
Significant defects can be corrected under SCP if they are eligible qualification failures and are corrected before the end of the second plan year after the year in which the failure occurred. A significant defect cannot be self-corrected if the plan is under examination by the IRS. The plan must also have a favorable determination letter and meet the eligibility requirements for SCP.
Corrections under SCP may involve a plan amendment. If an amendment is involved, the amended plan document must be submitted for a determination letter unless it is on a standardized prototype.
Voluntary Correction Program (“VCP”)
Defects that are not eligible for SCP, such as significant operational defects beyond the two- year correction period, plan document failures or demographic failures, may be corrected using VCP. For example, plan sponsors who have failed to timely adopt plan amendments or restate their plans to comply with law changes may utilize VCP. VCP cannot be utilized by a plan that is under examination by the IRS.
The plan sponsor submits an application with a fee to the IRS identifying the defect along with the proposed correction. The IRS, assuming agreement is reached, issues a letter stating that the correction is accepted.
Any correction submitted under a VCP filing must include the steps that will be taken to prevent the error from happening again. The correction must bring the plan and its participants to the point they would have been had the error never occurred. It must conform to the plan document (or the document must be amended to conform to the correction) and not violate any other 401(a) qualification requirements. The correction should resemble corrections already provided for in the regulations or other IRS published guidance, if possible.
It is possible to submit a VCP filing on a “John Doe” basis to see if the correction methodology is approved. In order to get the approval letter, should the IRS agree to the correction, the identifying information is then disclosed to the IRS. The anonymous filing can be withdrawn if no agreement is reached.
The VCP filing fees range from $750 for a plan covering 20 participants or less up to $25,000 for plans that cover over 10,000 participants. The fee for late amenders is 50% of the applicable fee if the VCP filing is within one year of the missed deadline.
Audit Closing Agreement Program (“Audit CAP”)
Audit CAP arises when the IRS discovers the disqualifying defect, and it is not an insignificant operational failure that is eligible for SCP. There are three parts to the program: the failure is corrected, a closing agreement is reached and the plan sponsor pays a negotiated sanction. All disqualifying defects are eligible for Audit CAP except for diversion or misuse of plan assets.
The sanction is calculated based on a list of twelve factors and bears a reasonable relationship to the nature, extent and severity of the failure. In the past, one of these factors was what the fee would have been under VCP. This often gave the representative of the plan sponsor a tool to negotiate for much lower sanctions.
Under the current program, the fee under VCP is ignored. The IRS takes the position that the sponsor is fully responsible for failing to find and report the error and should not have the benefit of the low fees available under VCP.
Approved Correction Methods Under EPCRS
Examples of some of the corrections that have been approved by the IRS are discussed below.
Failure to Provide Top Heavy Minimums: Make up the contributions, plus investment earnings, to the current and former participants affected in a defined contribution plan. In a defined benefit plan, the correction is to provide a minimum accrued benefit based on average salary and total top heavy years.
Late Correction of Failed ADP/ACP Tests: Two correction methods have been provided. The first is to make a qualified non-elective contribution (“QNEC”) or qualified matching contribution (“QMAC”) to the non-highly compensated employees (“NHCEs”).
The second is to calculate the excess contribution amount and distribute (or forfeit, if applicable) to the highly compensated employees (“HCEs”) the excess amount which caused the plan to fail the test, and contribute an equal amount to be allocated among the NHCEs as a QNEC.
Failure to Distribute Elective Deferrals in Excess of the Annual Limit ($12,000 for 2003): The excess contribution must be distributed with income. It will be taxable in both the year of distribution and the year of deferral.
Contributions in Excess of Section 415 Annual Additions Limit: If the excess contribution was an employer contribution, it must be placed, with earnings, into a suspense account and used to offset future employer contributions. If the excess was an employee deferral, then it must be distributed with earnings and any related matching contribution forfeited and placed into a suspense account.
Failure to Include an Eligible Employee: The employee must receive the employer contribution that he would have received if he had entered the plan properly, adjusted with investment earnings. In the case of a profit sharing plan, this does not mean that the contribution is reallocated. Rather, the employee must receive the same percentage of pay that the other eligible participants received.
If the employee would have been eligible to contribute to a 401(k) plan, the employer must make a contribution on his behalf equal to the average deferral percentage for his “group.” The participant’s “group” is either the HCEs or NHCEs, depending on his status. This contribution is also adjusted with earnings.
Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program (“DFVC”)
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) requires plan sponsors to file a Form 5500 with the DOL by the last day of the seventh month following the close of the plan year. A 2½ month extension to file the Form 5500 may be obtained by filing Form 5558.
The DOL penalty for the late filing of the Form 5500 for an ERISA plan is $50 per day with no maximum penalty. Non-filers are penalized $300 per day up to $30,000 per year until the forms are filed. The DFVC program was instituted to encourage late and non-filers to file past due forms without bankrupting the plan sponsor.
Under DFVC, an ERISA plan can file past due forms and pay a reduced penalty in advance. To further sweeten the offer, the IRS, who has its own delinquent filer penalty, will grant relief to filers who use this program.
The reduced penalty for a small plan (fewer than 100 participants) is $10 per day with a maximum of $750 per late form. If forms for more than one year are being filed, there is a maximum penalty of $1,500 per plan. If the plan is large (100 or more participants), the penalty is $10 per day up to a maximum of $2,000 per plan year, not to exceed $4,000 per plan.
This program cannot be used if the DOL has already inquired about a late or non-filed form. However, if the IRS makes the inquiry, nothing precludes the employer from filing immediately under DFVC, informing the IRS that this filing has been made and requesting that all IRS penalties be waived.
Plans that do not cover common law employees are not covered by ERISA and there is no DOL requirement for filing Form 5500 timely. Therefore, these plans may not utilize DFVC. Non-ERISA plans, which generally file Form 5500EZ, are still subject to IRS penalties for delinquent filing. However, the IRS has indicated that it will consider any reasonable cause statement submitted by the filer explaining why the return is late and look more favorably upon non-filers who come forward voluntarily.
Conclusion
There are several programs available for correcting plan defects. The least expensive way to correct defects is to discover them early and before the IRS or DOL. Frequent internal audits of all aspects of plan administration can quite possibly prevent insignificant defects from becoming significant. These audits are especially important since the IRS is planning an audit campaign targeting 401(k) plans.
Any EPCRS correction should not be attempted without the advice of an attorney or other professional advisor.
This newsletter is intended to provide general information on matters of interest in the area of qualified retirement plans and is distributed with the understanding that the publisher and distributor are not rendering legal, tax or other professional advice. Readers should not act or rely on any information in this newsletter without first seeking the advice of an independent tax advisor such as an attorney or CPA.
We’re leaders in retirement plan administration.
How can we help you get where you want to go?
Phone: (732) 747-1540
Email: [email protected]
Spring will arrive soon, promising new growth and a fresh beginning. It could also be the perfect time to do some spring cleaning for your plan. Let’s look at some areas that you might consider reviewing to ensure your retirement plan is operating efficiently.
Document your processes and procedures to make certain that plan tasks can be handled in case of any absences during an enrollment or pay period. Having a backup in place can prevent errors and delays that could lead to penalties.
Make sure to have a process in place to notify all new enrollments of their eligibility, regardless of whether the plan has automatic enrollment. Depending on the timing for plan entry, including the plan enrollment paperwork with the new hire paperwork could make entry easier for you. Please reach out with any questions regarding when an employee enters the plan.
Deposits of employee deferrals and loan repayments must be submitted to the plan as soon as possible to avoid penalties and corrections. For plans with less than 100 participants, a safe harbor rule allows deposits to be made within seven business days. For larger plans, the expectation is that the money will be deposited more quickly. Depositing these funds on the pay date will avoid the possibility of being late.
Monitoring deferral contribution limits during the calendar year will avoid refunds after year end. Make sure that your payroll is set up to stop deferrals once the limit is reached, including any catch-up contributions for those who have reached age 50.
To keep the plan in compliance, employer contributions must be deposited timely. Due dates are impacted by the type of contributions, required status and tax deductibility. If you have questions on when to deposit your employer contribution or even whether to make an employer contribution, please contact us.
Most plans must be covered by a fidelity bond. The minimum coverage is 10% of plan assets (rounded up to the next $1,000) and the maximum coverage is $500,000. Additional requirements apply to plans with employer securities or non-publicly traded assets. If your fidelity bond is insufficient, now is the time to raise the coverage. Inflation clauses that increase the bond amount as the plan assets increase can ensure that your bond coverage is always adequate. Contact us or your insurance provider if you don’t have a fidelity bond.
Another area to review is communication with participants. Helping your employees understand and trust the plan can increase their contributions. Be sure that your procedures include distributing any plan-related communications—including required participant notices.
Distributions also involve communication, including some of the aforementioned notices. Discussing distribution options with terminated participants, possibly as part of an exit interview, can help to reduce risk of lost participants. We’ll provide instruction on distributions for force-out distributions for small balances, testing corrections and required minimum distributions.
Your plan document is the legal source on how the plan should be administered; operating within its parameters is critical. It’s always worth taking time to review the plan document to ensure that you fully understand and are following its provisions. We’ll cover more details about the plan document later in this newsletter. We’re here to support you in keeping your plan in compliance. Please feel free to reach out with any questions.
Addressing the Challenge of Uncashed Distribution Checks
Uncashed distribution checks present a persistent and often overlooked challenge for retirement plan sponsors. Despite the best efforts of plan administrators, some participants fail to cash their distribution checks, leading to administrative burdens, fiduciary concerns and potential compliance issues. A recent publication by Retirement Management Services (RMS) sheds light on this issue and offers practical guidance for employers seeking to manage and mitigate the risks associated with uncashed checks.
Uncashed checks can arise for various reasons. Participants may have moved without updating their contact information, may not recognize the check as legitimate or may simply forget to deposit it. Regardless of the cause, the responsibility for addressing these uncashed funds ultimately falls on the plan sponsor. This creates a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of the participant while ensuring compliance with IRS and Department of Labor (DOL) regulations.
Sponsors are encouraged to maintain up-to-date contact information for all plan participants and to follow up promptly when checks remain uncashed. This may involve sending reminder letters, making phone calls or using certified mail to confirm receipt. In some cases, plan sponsors may also consider using electronic payment methods to reduce the likelihood of checks going uncashed in the first place.
The IRS and DOL have issued guidance on how to handle these situations, including the use of forfeiture accounts and escheatment to state unclaimed property programs. However, these options come with their own set of rules and potential pitfalls. For example, using a forfeiture account may require the plan document to explicitly allow for such treatment. Escheatment laws, which allow the government to assume control of unclaimed property, vary by state. As such, plan sponsors must carefully evaluate their options and consult with legal or compliance experts as needed.
Another important consideration is the documentation of all the efforts made to contact participants and resolve uncashed checks. Maintaining a clear audit trail can help demonstrate fiduciary prudence and protect the plan sponsor in the event of an audit or legal challenge. It is extremely important to have a written policy in place that outlines the steps to be taken when a check remains uncashed beyond a certain period.
By taking a proactive, well-documented and compliant approach, employers can fulfill their fiduciary duties, reduce administrative burdens and ensure that participants receive the benefits they are entitled to.
Source: Retirement Management Services – “Uncashed Distribution Checks” https://www.consultrms.com/Resources/59/Plan-Sponsor-Tips-and-Help/212/Uncashed-Distribution-Checks
Divorce and the Retirement Plan
When a participant in a qualified retirement plan undergoes a divorce, the participant’s account balance may be an asset that is split with the former spouse. As the plan exists for the exclusive benefit of its participants, a court order is required to transfer the participant’s benefits to the ex-spouse. Once approved by the plan administrator, this court order is called a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).
The QDRO is a judgment, decree or order that must be issued by a state authority (usually a court). It can be part of the divorce settlement or it may be a separate document. Because of the serious nature of separating the participant’s account balance, the QDRO is more than just an agreement made by both parties — it must also be signed by a judge.
A QDRO will describe how to divide the participant’s account balance between the participant and the ex-spouse, referred to as the alternate payee. In some cases, a set dollar amount will be allocated; in others, a percentage of the account may be designated. In the latter case, the amount assigned to the alternate payee represents the given percentage of the participant’s total vested account balance as of a specified valuation date. This percentage will apply to all sources — such as deferrals, matching or profit sharing — unless specified by the QDRO. Any interest and investment gains/losses that accrue between this valuation date and the date the funds are separated into an account for the alternate payee are often factored into this final calculation. If the participant has outstanding loans, the QDRO will usually indicate how the loans are handled.
Contributions such as deferrals and employer matching made after the valuation date are credited to the participant’s account. Earnings and losses are applied to the account balances. Once the division is complete, the alternate payee’s portion (either dollars or shares) is transferred to an account in the alternate payee’s name.
If the plan allows, the alternate payee may be paid out in a cash or rollover distribution. Not all plan documents allow the alternate payee to receive a distribution before reaching normal retirement age, so it’s important to follow the terms of the plan. In addition, the QDRO cannot violate the provisions of the plan document by requiring a plan to provide an alternate payee or participant with any type or form of benefit not otherwise provided under the plan.
Although the most common situation for a QDRO is a divorce, it can be issued in other situations, such as to a dependent in the case of child support. If the alternate payee is a minor child or legally incompetent, the order can also require payment to the individual with legal responsibility for the alternate payee. If a participant or their attorney provides you with a copy of a divorce decree that references the plan or a QDRO, please contact us immediately, and we will work with you to ensure it meets the requirements of the plan.
Important note for defined benefit plans: For 2025 plan years, PBGC premiums are due one month earlier than usual, specifically on the 15th day of the ninth month after the beginning of the plan year. For calendar year plans, this means the premium is due on September 15, 2025, instead of the usual October 15. This accelerated deadline is due to a provision in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.
Upcoming Compliance Deadlines for Calendar-Year Plans
© 2025 Benefit Insights, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
© 2026 Red Bank Pension Services. All rights reserved. Website by GSM Marketing